Government of Gujarat vs MADHUBEN W/O VEJALBHAI HURIYA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 180/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100001842026
Filing Number
180/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
180/2026
Registration Date
15-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250635
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MADHUBEN W/O VEJALBHAI HURIYA Advocate - N B CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Criminal Case 180/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dholka acquitted defendant Madhuben W/O Vejalbhai Huriya of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65P(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor without permit. The court found insufficient evidence—the panchnama (seizure record) witness provided no credible corroboration, no independent witnesses testified, and the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the lone panch witness merely confirmed signing the document but offered no substantive testimony supporting the prosecution's allegations. Applying established criminal law principles regarding burden of proof and witness credibility, the magistrate concluded the prosecution failed to prove its case, resulting in acquittal with bail conditions imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Criminal Case 180/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dholka acquitted defendant Madhuben W/O Vejalbhai Huriya of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65P(A)(A) for alleged illegal possession of 3 liters of liquor without permit. The court found insufficient evidence—the panchnama (seizure record) witness provided no credible corroboration, no independent witnesses testified, and the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the lone panch witness merely confirmed signing the document but offered no substantive testimony supporting the prosecution's allegations. Applying established criminal law principles regarding burden of proof and witness credibility, the magistrate concluded the prosecution failed to prove its case, resulting in acquittal with bail conditions imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts