Government of Gujarat vs RATIBEN W/O KUVARBHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 177/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100001812026
Filing Number
177/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
177/2026
Registration Date
15-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250688
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RATIBEN W/O KUVARBHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - N B CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 177/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhriol, acquitted defendant Ratiben W/O Kuvarbhai Jakhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence to prove the alleged offense of possessing 04 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹800 without proper permit on September 11, 2025. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including: the sole witness (panchnama signatory) merely confirmed signing the document without substantive corroboration; absence of independent police witness testimony; and lack of credible evidence linking the seized material to the offense. The court emphasized that witness quality and reliability matter more than quantity, and the prosecution's failure to present proper corroborating testimony rendered the case insufficiently proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 177/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhriol, acquitted defendant Ratiben W/O Kuvarbhai Jakhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence to prove the alleged offense of possessing 04 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹800 without proper permit on September 11, 2025. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including: the sole witness (panchnama signatory) merely confirmed signing the document without substantive corroboration; absence of independent police witness testimony; and lack of credible evidence linking the seized material to the offense. The court emphasized that witness quality and reliability matter more than quantity, and the prosecution's failure to present proper corroborating testimony rendered the case insufficiently proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts