Government of Gujarat vs KAVIBHAI VAKSHIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B CHAVDA — 173/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM100001772026

Case disposed

Filing Number

173/2026

Filing Date

15-01-2026

Registration No

173/2026

Registration Date

15-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202014250634

Police Station

DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KAVIBHAI VAKSHIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - N B CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case 173/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class in Dhole acquitted accused Kavibhai Vakshibhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Although prohibited liquor (5 liters, value ₹1000) was allegedly found in the accused's possession on 25/08/2025, the court noted significant evidentiary gaps—particularly that the only witness (panchnama signatory) merely confirmed signing the document without corroborating material facts, and no independent police witnesses testified. The court held that the prosecution's case lacked sufficient credibility and consistency to meet the requisite standard of proof in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 173/2026 The Judicial Magistrate First Class in Dhole acquitted accused Kavibhai Vakshibhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Although prohibited liquor (5 liters, value ₹1000) was allegedly found in the accused's possession on 25/08/2025, the court noted significant evidentiary gaps—particularly that the only witness (panchnama signatory) merely confirmed signing the document without corroborating material facts, and no independent police witnesses testified. The court held that the prosecution's case lacked sufficient credibility and consistency to meet the requisite standard of proof in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case