Government of Gujarat vs JILUBEN W/O NANJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA — 172/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM100001762026

Case disposed

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

15-01-2026

Registration No

172/2026

Registration Date

15-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202014250665

Police Station

DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JILUBEN W/O NANJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case 172/2026 Summary Court Decision: The Dhole First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Jiluben W/O Nanjibhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the sole witness (panchnama witness) merely testified to signing the document without substantively supporting the prosecution's case, and the absence of independent police witnesses further weakened the prosecution's evidence. Key Reasoning: The court applied established criminal law principles that the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt with conclusive evidence, and when witness testimony contains material inconsistencies or lacks credibility, it cannot form the basis for conviction. The court concluded the prosecution failed to adequately establish that the prohibited liquor (4 liters valued at ₹800) seized from the defendant's possession on 31/08/2025 was actually recovered from her custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 172/2026 Summary Court Decision: The Dhole First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Jiluben W/O Nanjibhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the sole witness (panchnama witness) merely testified to signing the document without substantively supporting the prosecution's case, and the absence of independent police witnesses further weakened the prosecution's evidence. Key Reasoning: The court applied established criminal law principles that the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt with conclusive evidence, and when witness testimony contains material inconsistencies or lacks credibility, it cannot form the basis for conviction. The court concluded the prosecution failed to adequately establish that the prohibited liquor (4 liters valued at ₹800) seized from the defendant's possession on 31/08/2025 was actually recovered from her custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case