Government of Gujarat vs JILUBEN W/O NANJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA — 172/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100001762026
Filing Number
172/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
15-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250665
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JILUBEN W/O NANJIBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - K G CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 172/2026 Summary Court Decision: The Dhole First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Jiluben W/O Nanjibhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the sole witness (panchnama witness) merely testified to signing the document without substantively supporting the prosecution's case, and the absence of independent police witnesses further weakened the prosecution's evidence. Key Reasoning: The court applied established criminal law principles that the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt with conclusive evidence, and when witness testimony contains material inconsistencies or lacks credibility, it cannot form the basis for conviction. The court concluded the prosecution failed to adequately establish that the prohibited liquor (4 liters valued at ₹800) seized from the defendant's possession on 31/08/2025 was actually recovered from her custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 172/2026 Summary Court Decision: The Dhole First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Jiluben W/O Nanjibhai Vaghela of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the sole witness (panchnama witness) merely testified to signing the document without substantively supporting the prosecution's case, and the absence of independent police witnesses further weakened the prosecution's evidence. Key Reasoning: The court applied established criminal law principles that the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt with conclusive evidence, and when witness testimony contains material inconsistencies or lacks credibility, it cannot form the basis for conviction. The court concluded the prosecution failed to adequately establish that the prohibited liquor (4 liters valued at ₹800) seized from the defendant's possession on 31/08/2025 was actually recovered from her custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts