Government of Gujarat vs NANDUBEN W/O BAHADURBHAI HADVADIYA Advocate - K G CHAVDA — 169/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM100001732026

Case disposed

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

15-01-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

15-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202014250435

Police Station

DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NANDUBEN W/O BAHADURBHAI HADVADIYA Advocate - K G CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 169/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhrole, acquitted the accused Nanduben (wife of Bahadurbhai Hadvadiya) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65-P(A)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish its case adequately. While prohibited liquor (3 liters valued at ₹600) was allegedly recovered from the accused's possession on 08/06/2025, the court found the witness testimony (a single panchnama witness) unconvincing and lacking corroboration. The absence of independent police witnesses and critical inconsistencies in the evidence undermined the prosecution's credibility. The court applied established criminal jurisprudence principles, noting that the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt through quality evidence, not merely quantity of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 169/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhrole, acquitted the accused Nanduben (wife of Bahadurbhai Hadvadiya) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65-P(A)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish its case adequately. While prohibited liquor (3 liters valued at ₹600) was allegedly recovered from the accused's possession on 08/06/2025, the court found the witness testimony (a single panchnama witness) unconvincing and lacking corroboration. The absence of independent police witnesses and critical inconsistencies in the evidence undermined the prosecution's credibility. The court applied established criminal jurisprudence principles, noting that the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt through quality evidence, not merely quantity of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case