Government of Gujarat vs NANDUBEN W/O BAHADURBHAI HADVADIYA Advocate - K G CHAVDA — 169/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM100001732026
Filing Number
169/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
169/2026
Registration Date
15-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHROL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202014250435
Police Station
DHROL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NANDUBEN W/O BAHADURBHAI HADVADIYA Advocate - K G CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 169/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhrole, acquitted the accused Nanduben (wife of Bahadurbhai Hadvadiya) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65-P(A)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish its case adequately. While prohibited liquor (3 liters valued at ₹600) was allegedly recovered from the accused's possession on 08/06/2025, the court found the witness testimony (a single panchnama witness) unconvincing and lacking corroboration. The absence of independent police witnesses and critical inconsistencies in the evidence undermined the prosecution's credibility. The court applied established criminal jurisprudence principles, noting that the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt through quality evidence, not merely quantity of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 169/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhrole, acquitted the accused Nanduben (wife of Bahadurbhai Hadvadiya) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65-P(A)(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish its case adequately. While prohibited liquor (3 liters valued at ₹600) was allegedly recovered from the accused's possession on 08/06/2025, the court found the witness testimony (a single panchnama witness) unconvincing and lacking corroboration. The absence of independent police witnesses and critical inconsistencies in the evidence undermined the prosecution's credibility. The court applied established criminal jurisprudence principles, noting that the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt through quality evidence, not merely quantity of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts