Government of Gujarat vs SADAMHUSEN HANIFBHAI NUTIYAR Advocate - J J PARMAR — 366/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090004542024

Filing Number

366/2024

Filing Date

24-Jul-2024

Registration No

366/2024

Registration Date

24-Jul-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025240054

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SADAMHUSEN HANIFBHAI NUTIYAR Advocate - J J PARMAR

  2. 2.SABUDINBHAI SULTANBHAI NOTIYAR

    Adv. J J PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 366/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants, Sadamhusen Hanifbhai Nutiyar and Shabuddinbhai Sultanbhai Notiyar, of all charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), 114, and GP Act Section 135(1). The prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's own testimony did not corroborate the allegations, and supporting witnesses could not substantiate the claims regarding the alleged assault, abusive language, and threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 21-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 05-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 31-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 24-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 366/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 366/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants, Sadamhusen Hanifbhai Nutiyar and Shabuddinbhai Sultanbhai Notiyar, of all charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), 114, and GP Act Section 135(1). The prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's own testimony did not corroborate the allegations, and supporting witnesses could not substantiate the claims regarding the alleged assault, abusive language, and threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case