Government of Gujarat vs RAVIBHAI GOVINDBHAI MAKWANA Advocate - V S MANSATTA — 316/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-E,116-B-81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090003822024

Filing Number

316/2024

Filing Date

20-May-2024

Registration No

316/2024

Registration Date

20-May-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025240059

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-E,116-B-81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVIBHAI GOVINDBHAI MAKWANA Advocate - V S MANSATTA

  2. 2.SAJAN BABUBHAI SAVSETA

    Adv. R B PANDYA

  3. 3.RAHUL BABUBHAI MAKWANA

    Adv. R B PANDYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C.No.316/2024 The court acquitted all three accused persons (Ravibhai Govindbhai Makwana, Sajan Babubhai Savaeta, and Rahul Babubhai Makwana) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case. The court noted critical deficiencies in the investigation, including lack of independent witnesses, absence of FSL reports, and reliance on biased testimonies from police officers who were colleagues of the accused, thereby removing doubt of the charges' credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 15-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 06-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 05-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 20-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.No.316/2024 The court acquitted all three accused persons (Ravibhai Govindbhai Makwana, Sajan Babubhai Savaeta, and Rahul Babubhai Makwana) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case. The court noted critical deficiencies in the investigation, including lack of independent witnesses, absence of FSL reports, and reliance on biased testimonies from police officers who were colleagues of the accused, thereby removing doubt of the charges' credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case