Government of Gujarat vs BHARATBHAI @ BHANO NARANBHAI DAVERA Advocate - V S MANSATTA — 222/2018

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,81,83,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090003022018

Filing Number

222/2018

Filing Date

26-Oct-2018

Registration No

222/2018

Registration Date

26-Oct-2018

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,81,83,98(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI @ BHANO NARANBHAI DAVERA Advocate - V S MANSATTA

  2. 2.RAVIRAJSINH @ RAVI RAMUBHA JADEJA

    Adv. J D MANKAD

  3. 3.DEVJIBHAI @ DEVO LALJIBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. V S MANSATTA

  4. 4.NAGDAN PRABHUDAN GADHVI (ABATE )(Abated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C.No.222/2018 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Bharatbhai Davera, Ravirajsinh Jadeja, and Devjibhai Parmar) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65(i), 81, 83, 98(2) due to insufficient evidence, granting them the benefit of doubt. The court found critical gaps in prosecution's case, including lack of independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in panchnama evidence, and investigative deficiencies that undermined the allegations of foreign liquor smuggling and sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 26-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 05-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 14-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 17-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 03-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 06-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 20-Aug-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 30-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 18-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 17-May-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 15-Mar-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 28-Jan-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 16-Dec-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 19-Oct-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 25-Sep-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 28-Aug-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 16-Jul-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 13-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 22-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 09-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 30-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 21-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 29-Aug-2023

    OrderView PDF

  38. 29-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 26-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 30-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 02-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 26-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 14-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 24-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 27-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 23-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 02-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 01-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 17-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 30-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 30-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 16-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 23-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 07-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 30-Apr-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 25-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 18-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 07-Jan-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 26-Nov-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 06-Oct-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 31-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 16-Jul-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 09-Jun-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 12-May-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 15-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 05-Mar-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 11-Feb-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  68. 06-Oct-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  69. 14-Aug-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  70. 10-Jun-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  71. 03-Apr-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  72. 13-Feb-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  73. 19-Dec-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  74. 20-Sep-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  75. 10-Jul-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  76. 07-May-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  77. 14-Mar-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  78. 14-Feb-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  79. 19-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  80. 26-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.No.222/2018 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Bharatbhai Davera, Ravirajsinh Jadeja, and Devjibhai Parmar) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65(i), 81, 83, 98(2) due to insufficient evidence, granting them the benefit of doubt. The court found critical gaps in prosecution's case, including lack of independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in panchnama evidence, and investigative deficiencies that undermined the allegations of foreign liquor smuggling and sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case