Government of Gujarat vs SAHDEVSINH SANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - J J PARMAR — 211/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 186,332,504,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090002142022

Filing Number

211/2022

Filing Date

29-Jan-2022

Registration No

211/2022

Registration Date

29-Jan-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025210125

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 186,332,504,114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAHDEVSINH SANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - J J PARMAR

  2. 2.KRIPALSINH SANUBHA JADEJA

    Adv. J J PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Case No. 211/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Sahdevsinh Sanubha Jadeja and Kripalsinh Sanubha Jadeja) of all charges under IPC Sections 186, 332, 504, 114 and GP Act Section 135(1). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included: contradictions between the complainant's written complaint and sworn testimony; absence of independent witness corroboration; lack of procedural compliance (particularly the required written complaint for Section 186 charges under CrPC Section 195); and insufficient evidence of injuries caused by the defendants. The court noted the complainant's testimony contained significant discrepancies regarding the incident details, and prosecution witnesses were overwhelmingly employees of the same electricity department, raising credibility concerns. The court ruled that the burden of proof rested with the prosecution, which failed to discharge it satisfactorily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 02-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 21-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 23-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 19-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 22-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 28-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 03-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 22-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 23-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 21-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 24-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 27-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 05-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 01-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 15-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 01-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 07-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 17-Jan-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 15-Dec-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 02-Nov-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 11-Oct-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 07-Sep-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 28-Jul-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 02-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 08-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 13-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 31-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 19-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 29-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 211/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Case No. 211/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Sahdevsinh Sanubha Jadeja and Kripalsinh Sanubha Jadeja) of all charges under IPC Sections 186, 332, 504, 114 and GP Act Section 135(1). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included: contradictions between the complainant's written complaint and sworn testimony; absence of independent witness corroboration; lack of procedural compliance (particularly the required written complaint for Section 186 charges under CrPC Section 195); and insufficient evidence of injuries caused by the defendants. The court noted the complainant's testimony contained significant discrepancies regarding the incident details, and prosecution witnesses were overwhelmingly employees of the same electricity department, raising credibility concerns. The court ruled that the burden of proof rested with the prosecution, which failed to discharge it satisfactorily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case