Government of Gujarat vs SAHDEVSINH SANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - J J PARMAR — 211/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 186,332,504,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM090002142022
Filing Number
211/2022
Filing Date
29-Jan-2022
Registration No
211/2022
Registration Date
29-Jan-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, JODIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202025210125
Police Station
JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAHDEVSINH SANUBHA JADEJA Advocate - J J PARMAR
-
2.KRIPALSINH SANUBHA JADEJA
Adv. J J PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Case No. 211/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Sahdevsinh Sanubha Jadeja and Kripalsinh Sanubha Jadeja) of all charges under IPC Sections 186, 332, 504, 114 and GP Act Section 135(1). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included: contradictions between the complainant's written complaint and sworn testimony; absence of independent witness corroboration; lack of procedural compliance (particularly the required written complaint for Section 186 charges under CrPC Section 195); and insufficient evidence of injuries caused by the defendants. The court noted the complainant's testimony contained significant discrepancies regarding the incident details, and prosecution witnesses were overwhelmingly employees of the same electricity department, raising credibility concerns. The court ruled that the burden of proof rested with the prosecution, which failed to discharge it satisfactorily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Mar-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Dec-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Nov-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Oct-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Sep-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jul-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-May-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Mar-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 211/2022
Case Summary: Case No. 211/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Sahdevsinh Sanubha Jadeja and Kripalsinh Sanubha Jadeja) of all charges under IPC Sections 186, 332, 504, 114 and GP Act Section 135(1). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. Critical deficiencies included: contradictions between the complainant's written complaint and sworn testimony; absence of independent witness corroboration; lack of procedural compliance (particularly the required written complaint for Section 186 charges under CrPC Section 195); and insufficient evidence of injuries caused by the defendants. The court noted the complainant's testimony contained significant discrepancies regarding the incident details, and prosecution witnesses were overwhelmingly employees of the same electricity department, raising credibility concerns. The court ruled that the burden of proof rested with the prosecution, which failed to discharge it satisfactorily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts