Government of Gujarat vs RAMNIKBHAI CHAMANBHAI PADHIYAR ( ABATE )(Abated) — 161/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,120(B),504,506. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM090002082020
Filing Number
161/2020
Filing Date
17-Oct-2020
Registration No
161/2020
Registration Date
17-Oct-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, JODIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMNIKBHAI CHAMANBHAI PADHIYAR ( ABATE )(Abated)
-
2.SAHIL KARIMBHAI JASHARAYA(Abated)
Adv. V S MANSATTA
-
3.RAMESHBHAI @ LAMBO KARSHANBHAI ARAJANBHAI PADHIYAR
Adv. V S MANSATTA
-
4.MAJID SIDIKBHAI KAMORA(Abated)
Adv. V S MANSATTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: Government of Gujarat v. Ramnikbhai Chamanbhai Padhiyar & Others Case No.: 161/2020 Court: Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jodia, Jamnagar Decision Date: 20 March 2026 Case Duration: 5 years, 5 months, 3 days DECISION The court acquitted accused Rameshbhai (Lambo) Karshanbhai Arajanbhai Padhiyar of charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, 120(B), 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. KEY FACTS The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to defraud the complainant of sewing machines worth Rs. 1,17,200/-, obtained through a phone call-based transaction on 23 December 2019, with false promises of payment that were never fulfilled. COURT'S REASONING The court found critical evidentiary gaps: panchayat witnesses to the seizure provided no corroborating testimony; no direct evidence linked the accused to the alleged conspiracy; the complainant had no prior relationship with the accused; all communications occurred via phone with unverified participants; and no documentary evidence (call recordings, mobile details) was produced establishing the accused's involvement in the alleged breach of trust or cheating. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Sep-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Sep-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Dec-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Oct-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Oct-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-May-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-May-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-May-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Apr-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Mar-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Feb-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Feb-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Dec-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Sep-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Aug-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jul-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jun-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-May-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Mar-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jan-2021
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2020
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Oct-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 161/2020
CASE SUMMARY: Government of Gujarat v. Ramnikbhai Chamanbhai Padhiyar & Others Case No.: 161/2020 Court: Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jodia, Jamnagar Decision Date: 20 March 2026 Case Duration: 5 years, 5 months, 3 days DECISION The court acquitted accused Rameshbhai (Lambo) Karshanbhai Arajanbhai Padhiyar of charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, 120(B), 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. KEY FACTS The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to defraud the complainant of sewing machines worth Rs. 1,17,200/-, obtained through a phone call-based transaction on 23 December 2019, with false promises of payment that were never fulfilled. COURT'S REASONING The court found critical evidentiary gaps: panchayat witnesses to the seizure provided no corroborating testimony; no direct evidence linked the accused to the alleged conspiracy; the complainant had no prior relationship with the accused; all communications occurred via phone with unverified participants; and no documentary evidence (call recordings, mobile details) was produced establishing the accused's involvement in the alleged breach of trust or cheating. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts