Government of Gujarat vs RAMNIKBHAI CHAMANBHAI PADHIYAR ( ABATE )(Abated) — 161/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,120(B),504,506. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090002082020

Filing Number

161/2020

Filing Date

17-Oct-2020

Registration No

161/2020

Registration Date

17-Oct-2020

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,120(B),504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMNIKBHAI CHAMANBHAI PADHIYAR ( ABATE )(Abated)

  2. 2.SAHIL KARIMBHAI JASHARAYA(Abated)

    Adv. V S MANSATTA

  3. 3.RAMESHBHAI @ LAMBO KARSHANBHAI ARAJANBHAI PADHIYAR

    Adv. V S MANSATTA

  4. 4.MAJID SIDIKBHAI KAMORA(Abated)

    Adv. V S MANSATTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: Government of Gujarat v. Ramnikbhai Chamanbhai Padhiyar & Others Case No.: 161/2020 Court: Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jodia, Jamnagar Decision Date: 20 March 2026 Case Duration: 5 years, 5 months, 3 days DECISION The court acquitted accused Rameshbhai (Lambo) Karshanbhai Arajanbhai Padhiyar of charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, 120(B), 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. KEY FACTS The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to defraud the complainant of sewing machines worth Rs. 1,17,200/-, obtained through a phone call-based transaction on 23 December 2019, with false promises of payment that were never fulfilled. COURT'S REASONING The court found critical evidentiary gaps: panchayat witnesses to the seizure provided no corroborating testimony; no direct evidence linked the accused to the alleged conspiracy; the complainant had no prior relationship with the accused; all communications occurred via phone with unverified participants; and no documentary evidence (call recordings, mobile details) was produced establishing the accused's involvement in the alleged breach of trust or cheating. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 26-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 12-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 17-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 03-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 19-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 04-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 08-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 20-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 16-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 07-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 10-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 19-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 26-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 12-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 03-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 06-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 14-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 04-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 10-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 05-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 26-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 14-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 22-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 25-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 03-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 06-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 21-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 18-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 13-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 29-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 26-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 20-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 09-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 27-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 25-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 09-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 27-Apr-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 04-Apr-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  68. 08-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  69. 14-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  70. 02-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  71. 11-Jan-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  72. 23-Dec-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  73. 01-Dec-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  74. 27-Oct-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  75. 23-Sep-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  76. 17-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  77. 02-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  78. 20-Jul-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  79. 22-Jun-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  80. 18-May-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  81. 15-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  82. 26-Mar-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  83. 09-Feb-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  84. 11-Jan-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  85. 22-Dec-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  86. 07-Nov-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  87. 17-Oct-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 161/2020

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Government of Gujarat v. Ramnikbhai Chamanbhai Padhiyar & Others Case No.: 161/2020 Court: Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jodia, Jamnagar Decision Date: 20 March 2026 Case Duration: 5 years, 5 months, 3 days DECISION The court acquitted accused Rameshbhai (Lambo) Karshanbhai Arajanbhai Padhiyar of charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, 120(B), 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. KEY FACTS The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to defraud the complainant of sewing machines worth Rs. 1,17,200/-, obtained through a phone call-based transaction on 23 December 2019, with false promises of payment that were never fulfilled. COURT'S REASONING The court found critical evidentiary gaps: panchayat witnesses to the seizure provided no corroborating testimony; no direct evidence linked the accused to the alleged conspiracy; the complainant had no prior relationship with the accused; all communications occurred via phone with unverified participants; and no documentary evidence (call recordings, mobile details) was produced establishing the accused's involvement in the alleged breach of trust or cheating. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case