Government of Gujarat vs BABUBHAI @ BHABHABHAI MOHANBHAI DANGAR Advocate - A P MANKAD — 117/2023

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1)(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090001852023

Filing Number

117/2023

Filing Date

05-Apr-2023

Registration No

117/2023

Registration Date

05-Apr-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025200214

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1)(B)
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABUBHAI @ BHABHABHAI MOHANBHAI DANGAR Advocate - A P MANKAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 117/2023 The court acquitted the accused Babubhai (also known as Bhabhabhai) Mohanbhai Dangar of charges under the Arms Act Section 25(1)(b) and IPC Section 135(1), finding insufficient evidence due to contradictions in witness testimony, unexplained discrepancies between the FSL report and panchnama regarding the seized weapon's specifications, and lack of corroborating independent witness testimony. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that reliance on police witnesses alone is insufficient for conviction in serious cases, and granted the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 06-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 20-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 14-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 10-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 18-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 04-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 07-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 25-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 26-Jun-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 12-Jun-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 16-May-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 09-May-2025

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 01-May-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 17-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 11-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 04-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 03-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 20-Mar-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 13-Mar-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 20-Feb-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 23-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 19-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 13-Nov-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 01-Oct-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 09-Aug-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 31-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 25-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 22-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 12-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 01-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 26-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 22-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 25-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 25-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 27-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 10-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 05-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 117/2023 The court acquitted the accused Babubhai (also known as Bhabhabhai) Mohanbhai Dangar of charges under the Arms Act Section 25(1)(b) and IPC Section 135(1), finding insufficient evidence due to contradictions in witness testimony, unexplained discrepancies between the FSL report and panchnama regarding the seized weapon's specifications, and lack of corroborating independent witness testimony. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that reliance on police witnesses alone is insufficient for conviction in serious cases, and granted the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case