Government of Gujarat vs HUSENBHAI KASAMBHAI BUCHAD Advocate - R B PANDYA — 118/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090001832026

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

118/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025260050

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HUSENBHAI KASAMBHAI BUCHAD Advocate - R B PANDYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case 118/2026 Summary The court acquitted defendant Husenbhai Kasambhai Buchad of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case through independent witness testimony, as key witnesses either retracted statements or provided no corroborating evidence beyond police investigation records. The court found the investigation officer's testimony inadequate to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 118/2026 Summary The court acquitted defendant Husenbhai Kasambhai Buchad of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish its case through independent witness testimony, as key witnesses either retracted statements or provided no corroborating evidence beyond police investigation records. The court found the investigation officer's testimony inadequate to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case