Government of Gujarat vs KAMLESHBHAI HASMUKHBHAI HALVADIYA Advocate - A P MANKAD — 117/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090001822026

Filing Number

117/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

117/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025260017

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMLESHBHAI HASMUKHBHAI HALVADIYA Advocate - A P MANKAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C. No. 117/2026 Court Decision: The Jodiya JMFC acquitted the accused Kamleshbhai Hasmukhbhai Halvadiya of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panch (witness) statements lacked independent corroboration, the investigating officer's evidence was insufficient, and no credible evidence on record supported the charge of illegal weapon possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 117/2026 Court Decision: The Jodiya JMFC acquitted the accused Kamleshbhai Hasmukhbhai Halvadiya of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panch (witness) statements lacked independent corroboration, the investigating officer's evidence was insufficient, and no credible evidence on record supported the charge of illegal weapon possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case