Government of Gujarat vs KULSUMBEN URFE HAVABEN WIFE OF HUSENBHAI RADHA Advocate - R B PANDYA — 114/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM090001792026
Filing Number
114/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
114/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, JODIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202025260043
Police Station
JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KULSUMBEN URFE HAVABEN WIFE OF HUSENBHAI RADHA Advocate - R B PANDYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 114/2026 The Jodiya First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the defendant Kulsumben (alias Havaben) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65 AA for illegal possession of 4 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 800. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical deficiencies: witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the seizure panchnama, no independent witnesses were examined despite public location, FSL report on the seized substance was not produced, and the investigating officer's testimony contained contradictions regarding direct possession. Applying the benefit of doubt principle, the court discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 114/2026
Case Summary: C.C. No. 114/2026 The Jodiya First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the defendant Kulsumben (alias Havaben) of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65 AA for illegal possession of 4 liters of country liquor valued at Rs. 800. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical deficiencies: witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the seizure panchnama, no independent witnesses were examined despite public location, FSL report on the seized substance was not produced, and the investigating officer's testimony contained contradictions regarding direct possession. Applying the benefit of doubt principle, the court discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts