Government of Gujarat vs VISHALBHAI MAHESHBHAI FARUKIYA Advocate - R B PANDYA — 112/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM090001772026
Filing Number
112/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, JODIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202025260020
Police Station
JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VISHALBHAI MAHESHBHAI FARUKIYA Advocate - R B PANDYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 112/2026 The court acquitted defendant Vishalbhai Maheshbhai Farukiya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 65 A.A., finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence, including witnesses failing to corroborate the recovery of illicit liquor, absence of independent witnesses, lack of FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report on seized material, and contradictions in the investigating officer's testimony, applying the principle that the benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2026
Case Summary: C.C. No. 112/2026 The court acquitted defendant Vishalbhai Maheshbhai Farukiya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 65 A.A., finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence, including witnesses failing to corroborate the recovery of illicit liquor, absence of independent witnesses, lack of FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report on seized material, and contradictions in the investigating officer's testimony, applying the principle that the benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts