Government of Gujarat vs HUSENBHAI URFE HANIF URFE JAMBU ABHARAMBHAI URFE IBRAHIMBHAI RADHA Advocate - R B PANDYA — 111/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM090001762026
Filing Number
111/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
111/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, JODIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202025260028
Police Station
JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HUSENBHAI URFE HANIF URFE JAMBU ABHARAMBHAI URFE IBRAHIMBHAI RADHA Advocate - R B PANDYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case 111/2026 Summary The Jodiya First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Husenbhai (alias Hanif) on charges under Section 65-AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing country-made alcohol without permit. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence: witness testimonies contradicted key facts, panchanama (seizure record) lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, FSL report on the seized substance was absent, and the investigator's testimony contained inconsistencies. Applying the benefit of doubt principle, the court held the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable suspicion and acquitted the accused unconditionally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 111/2026
Case 111/2026 Summary The Jodiya First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Husenbhai (alias Hanif) on charges under Section 65-AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing country-made alcohol without permit. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence: witness testimonies contradicted key facts, panchanama (seizure record) lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, FSL report on the seized substance was absent, and the investigator's testimony contained inconsistencies. Applying the benefit of doubt principle, the court held the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable suspicion and acquitted the accused unconditionally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts