Government of Gujarat vs HUSENBHAI URFE HANIF URFE JAMBU ABHARAMBHAI URFE IBRAHIMBHAI RADHA Advocate - R B PANDYA — 110/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090001752026

Filing Number

110/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

110/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025260019

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HUSENBHAI URFE HANIF URFE JAMBU ABHARAMBHAI URFE IBRAHIMBHAI RADHA Advocate - R B PANDYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C. No. 110/2026 Court Decision: The defendant Husenbhai was acquitted and discharged of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65 AA, due to insufficient evidence. The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case, including lack of independent witness corroboration, unsubstantiated recovery of alleged contraband, and absence of forensic confirmation. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the witnesses (panchas) failed to support the seizure narrative, the investigating officer admitted no direct recovery from the accused's possession, and the prosecution failed to prove conscious possession of the liquor. The burden of proof rested with the prosecution, which it failed to discharge beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 110/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 110/2026 Court Decision: The defendant Husenbhai was acquitted and discharged of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65 AA, due to insufficient evidence. The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case, including lack of independent witness corroboration, unsubstantiated recovery of alleged contraband, and absence of forensic confirmation. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the witnesses (panchas) failed to support the seizure narrative, the investigating officer admitted no direct recovery from the accused's possession, and the prosecution failed to prove conscious possession of the liquor. The burden of proof rested with the prosecution, which it failed to discharge beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case