Government of Gujarat vs OSMANGANI JUSUBBHAI GADH Advocate - R B PANDYA — 108/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090001732026

Filing Number

108/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

108/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025260027

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OSMANGANI JUSUBBHAI GADH Advocate - R B PANDYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 108/2026 The Jodiya Judicial Magistrate (First Class) acquitted the accused Osmangani Jusubbhai Gadh of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65 AA, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally possessed 2 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 400, as the witnesses did not corroborate the seizure panchnama, FSL reports were absent, and independent corroborating witnesses were not examined despite available opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 108/2026 The Jodiya Judicial Magistrate (First Class) acquitted the accused Osmangani Jusubbhai Gadh of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65 AA, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally possessed 2 liters of country liquor worth Rs. 400, as the witnesses did not corroborate the seizure panchnama, FSL reports were absent, and independent corroborating witnesses were not examined despite available opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case