Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI DINESHBHAI GOHIL Advocate - J U SHASTRI — 58/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM090000972026
Filing Number
58/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
58/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, JODIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202025250300
Police Station
JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIJAYBHAI DINESHBHAI GOHIL Advocate - J U SHASTRI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 58/2026 The court acquitted defendant Vijaybhai Dineshbhai Gohil of charges under BNS Section 223 (violating a prohibitory order regarding heavy vehicles on a 26 km road stretch). The court found insufficient credible evidence: the sole eyewitness provided only confirmatory testimony matching the complainant's case, no independent witnesses were examined, and the investigating officer's report lacked corroboration. The court ruled the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting procedural deficiencies in the investigation undermined the case's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2026
Case Summary: 58/2026 The court acquitted defendant Vijaybhai Dineshbhai Gohil of charges under BNS Section 223 (violating a prohibitory order regarding heavy vehicles on a 26 km road stretch). The court found insufficient credible evidence: the sole eyewitness provided only confirmatory testimony matching the complainant's case, no independent witnesses were examined, and the investigating officer's report lacked corroboration. The court ruled the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting procedural deficiencies in the investigation undermined the case's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts