Government of Gujarat vs PRATAPBA WIFE OF BHIKHUBHA SODHA Advocate - A P MANKAD — 41/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM090000702026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, JODIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202025250434
Police Station
JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRATAPBA WIFE OF BHIKHUBHA SODHA Advocate - A P MANKAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C.No.41/2026 Court Decision: The accused Pratapba (wife of Bhikhubha Sodha) was acquitted and discharged under the benefit of doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that she unlawfully possessed 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800 in violation of the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 65-AA. Key Reasoning: The judge identified critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: witness panchnamas (formal records) lacked substantiation, independent witnesses were absent despite opportunity, FSL laboratory reports on seized liquor samples were not produced, and the investigator's testimony contained contradictions about recovery from the accused's direct possession. The court applied the principle that when prosecution evidence contains gaps and inconsistencies, the benefit of doubt goes to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2026
Case Summary: C.C.No.41/2026 Court Decision: The accused Pratapba (wife of Bhikhubha Sodha) was acquitted and discharged under the benefit of doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that she unlawfully possessed 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800 in violation of the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 65-AA. Key Reasoning: The judge identified critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: witness panchnamas (formal records) lacked substantiation, independent witnesses were absent despite opportunity, FSL laboratory reports on seized liquor samples were not produced, and the investigator's testimony contained contradictions about recovery from the accused's direct possession. The court applied the principle that when prosecution evidence contains gaps and inconsistencies, the benefit of doubt goes to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts