Government of Gujarat vs PRATAPBA WIFE OF BHIKHUBHA SODHA Advocate - A P MANKAD — 41/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090000702026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025250434

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRATAPBA WIFE OF BHIKHUBHA SODHA Advocate - A P MANKAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C.No.41/2026 Court Decision: The accused Pratapba (wife of Bhikhubha Sodha) was acquitted and discharged under the benefit of doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that she unlawfully possessed 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800 in violation of the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 65-AA. Key Reasoning: The judge identified critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: witness panchnamas (formal records) lacked substantiation, independent witnesses were absent despite opportunity, FSL laboratory reports on seized liquor samples were not produced, and the investigator's testimony contained contradictions about recovery from the accused's direct possession. The court applied the principle that when prosecution evidence contains gaps and inconsistencies, the benefit of doubt goes to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.No.41/2026 Court Decision: The accused Pratapba (wife of Bhikhubha Sodha) was acquitted and discharged under the benefit of doubt. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that she unlawfully possessed 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800 in violation of the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 65-AA. Key Reasoning: The judge identified critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: witness panchnamas (formal records) lacked substantiation, independent witnesses were absent despite opportunity, FSL laboratory reports on seized liquor samples were not produced, and the investigator's testimony contained contradictions about recovery from the accused's direct possession. The court applied the principle that when prosecution evidence contains gaps and inconsistencies, the benefit of doubt goes to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case