Government of Gujarat vs HUSHENBHAI URFE ANVARBHAI MUSABHAI RADHA Advocate - J J PARMAR — 28/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM090000572026

Filing Number

28/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JODIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202025250342

Police Station

JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HUSHENBHAI URFE ANVARBHAI MUSABHAI RADHA Advocate - J J PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C. No. 28/2026 The court acquitted the accused Hushenbhai (alias Anvarbhai Musabhai Radha) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65 AA due to insufficient evidence. Although the prosecution alleged the accused possessed 6 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹1,200, the court found critical gaps: the panchnama (seizure record) lacked corroboration from the attesting witnesses, no independent witnesses testified, FSL reports on the seized material were absent, and the investigator's testimony contained contradictions regarding direct possession. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and granted the accused benefit of doubt under BNS Section 104. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 28/2026 The court acquitted the accused Hushenbhai (alias Anvarbhai Musabhai Radha) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65 AA due to insufficient evidence. Although the prosecution alleged the accused possessed 6 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹1,200, the court found critical gaps: the panchnama (seizure record) lacked corroboration from the attesting witnesses, no independent witnesses testified, FSL reports on the seized material were absent, and the investigator's testimony contained contradictions regarding direct possession. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt and granted the accused benefit of doubt under BNS Section 104. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case