Government of Gujarat vs AJAYBHAI SHIVLALBHAI RATHOD Advocate - R B PANDYA — 22/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM090000252026
Filing Number
22/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
22/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, JODIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202025250455
Police Station
JODIA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAYBHAI SHIVLALBHAI RATHOD Advocate - R B PANDYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 22/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Ajaybhai Shivlalbhai Rathod, was acquitted and discharged of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 65-A due to insufficient evidence. The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case: the independent witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the seizure, no FSL report confirmed the substance was alcohol, and the investigating officer's testimony contained contradictions. Applying the benefit of doubt principle, the court ruled the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2026
Case Summary: C.C. No. 22/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Ajaybhai Shivlalbhai Rathod, was acquitted and discharged of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Section 65-A due to insufficient evidence. The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case: the independent witnesses (panchas) did not corroborate the seizure, no FSL report confirmed the substance was alcohol, and the investigating officer's testimony contained contradictions. Applying the benefit of doubt principle, the court ruled the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts