Government of Gujarat vs MANJIBHAI TEJABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A P LALKIYA — 1362/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504, 506-2, 114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040017482023
Filing Number
1362/2023
Filing Date
10-Oct-2023
Registration No
1362/2023
Registration Date
10-Oct-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202013230209
Police Station
SETHVADALA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANJIBHAI TEJABHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A P LALKIYA
-
2.MANGAL URFE BITU MANJIBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. A P LALKIYA
-
3.SANJAYBHAI NARANBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. A P LALKIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 1362/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused—Manjibhai Tejabhai Vaghela, Mangalbhai (alias Bitu) Manjibhai Vaghela, and Sanjaybhai Naranbhai Vaghela—of charges under IPC Sections 504, 506(2), and 114, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that while the complainant alleged the accused used abusive language and made threats to kill, the prosecution's evidence was contradictory and insufficient. The accused witnesses' testimony conflicted with the complainant's account, and critical evidence elements—such as specific abusive words actually spoken—were not clearly established on record, leaving reasonable doubt about their guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1362/2023
Case Summary: 1362/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused—Manjibhai Tejabhai Vaghela, Mangalbhai (alias Bitu) Manjibhai Vaghela, and Sanjaybhai Naranbhai Vaghela—of charges under IPC Sections 504, 506(2), and 114, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that while the complainant alleged the accused used abusive language and made threats to kill, the prosecution's evidence was contradictory and insufficient. The accused witnesses' testimony conflicted with the complainant's account, and critical evidence elements—such as specific abusive words actually spoken—were not clearly established on record, leaving reasonable doubt about their guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts