Government of Gujarat vs NARANBHAI DEVSHIBHAI VARSANKIA Advocate - N H LALANI — 1361/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323, 504, 506-2, 114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040017472023
Filing Number
1361/2023
Filing Date
10-Oct-2023
Registration No
1361/2023
Registration Date
10-Oct-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202013230210
Police Station
SETHVADALA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARANBHAI DEVSHIBHAI VARSANKIA Advocate - N H LALANI
-
2.KHENGARBHAI NARANBHAI VARSANKIYA
Adv. N H LALANI
-
3.ALKABEN KHENGARBHAI VARSANKIYA
Adv. N H LALANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC 1361/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Naranbhai Devshibhai Varsankiya, Khengarbhai Naranbhai Varsankiya, and Alkaben Khengarbhai Varsankiya) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and threatening behavior against the complainant and his wife. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Specifically, the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration, contained inconsistencies with the formal FIR, and no independent witnesses or medical evidence supported claims of physical injury. The court noted pre-existing disputes between parties and found the evidence insufficient to prove the accused acted with criminal intent or delivered threats with knowledge of causing harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1361/2023
Case Summary: CC 1361/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Naranbhai Devshibhai Varsankiya, Khengarbhai Naranbhai Varsankiya, and Alkaben Khengarbhai Varsankiya) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and threatening behavior against the complainant and his wife. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Specifically, the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration, contained inconsistencies with the formal FIR, and no independent witnesses or medical evidence supported claims of physical injury. The court noted pre-existing disputes between parties and found the evidence insufficient to prove the accused acted with criminal intent or delivered threats with knowledge of causing harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts