Government of Gujarat vs NARANBHAI DEVSHIBHAI VARSANKIA Advocate - N H LALANI — 1361/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323, 504, 506-2, 114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM040017472023

Filing Number

1361/2023

Filing Date

10-Oct-2023

Registration No

1361/2023

Registration Date

10-Oct-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202013230210

Police Station

SETHVADALA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323, 504, 506-2, 114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARANBHAI DEVSHIBHAI VARSANKIA Advocate - N H LALANI

  2. 2.KHENGARBHAI NARANBHAI VARSANKIYA

    Adv. N H LALANI

  3. 3.ALKABEN KHENGARBHAI VARSANKIYA

    Adv. N H LALANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 1361/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Naranbhai Devshibhai Varsankiya, Khengarbhai Naranbhai Varsankiya, and Alkaben Khengarbhai Varsankiya) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and threatening behavior against the complainant and his wife. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Specifically, the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration, contained inconsistencies with the formal FIR, and no independent witnesses or medical evidence supported claims of physical injury. The court noted pre-existing disputes between parties and found the evidence insufficient to prove the accused acted with criminal intent or delivered threats with knowledge of causing harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 19-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 29-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 21-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 16-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 24-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 02-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 22-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 23-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 19-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 28-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 20-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 10-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 10-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1361/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 1361/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Naranbhai Devshibhai Varsankiya, Khengarbhai Naranbhai Varsankiya, and Alkaben Khengarbhai Varsankiya) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and threatening behavior against the complainant and his wife. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Specifically, the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration, contained inconsistencies with the formal FIR, and no independent witnesses or medical evidence supported claims of physical injury. The court noted pre-existing disputes between parties and found the evidence insufficient to prove the accused acted with criminal intent or delivered threats with knowledge of causing harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case