Government of Gujarat vs LAKHMANBHAI DHANABHAI ULVA Advocate - N H LALANI — 1329/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040016512025
Filing Number
1329/2025
Filing Date
11-11-2025
Registration No
1329/2025
Registration Date
11-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202026250357
Police Station
JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LAKHMANBHAI DHANABHAI ULVA Advocate - N H LALANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 05-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY The Jamnagar First Class Judicial Magistrate court acquitted accused Lakhmanbhai Dhanabhai Ulva of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. While police witnesses testified to recovering 15 liters of country liquor (valued ₹3,000) and a Honda motorcycle (₹20,000) from the accused during a May 15, 2025 patrol, the court found the panchnama (seizure record) unverified by independent witnesses and no FSL report confirming the seized material was prohibited alcohol, rendering the prosecution's case unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY The Jamnagar First Class Judicial Magistrate court acquitted accused Lakhmanbhai Dhanabhai Ulva of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. While police witnesses testified to recovering 15 liters of country liquor (valued ₹3,000) and a Honda motorcycle (₹20,000) from the accused during a May 15, 2025 patrol, the court found the panchnama (seizure record) unverified by independent witnesses and no FSL report confirming the seized material was prohibited alcohol, rendering the prosecution's case unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts