Government of Gujarat vs JAKHSIBHAI CHHAGANBHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - A P LALKIYA — 1182/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040014702025
Filing Number
1182/2025
Filing Date
30-08-2025
Registration No
1182/2025
Registration Date
30-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202013250215
Police Station
SETHVADALA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAKHSIBHAI CHHAGANBHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - A P LALKIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 09-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1182/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Jakhsibhai Chhaganbhai Jakhaniya, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. While police testimony corroborated the recovery of 4 liters of illicit liquor from the accused's residence on July 15, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish this through independent corroborating witnesses—the panchs (independent observers) provided no substantive testimony beyond confirming their signatures on the panchnama (seizure document). The court found that without independent verification supporting the recovery claim, the factual allegations could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt, and therefore acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1182/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Jakhsibhai Chhaganbhai Jakhaniya, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence. While police testimony corroborated the recovery of 4 liters of illicit liquor from the accused's residence on July 15, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish this through independent corroborating witnesses—the panchs (independent observers) provided no substantive testimony beyond confirming their signatures on the panchnama (seizure document). The court found that without independent verification supporting the recovery claim, the factual allegations could not be proven beyond reasonable doubt, and therefore acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts