Government of Gujarat vs BHARATBHAI KARABHAI MANDERA Advocate - M L PATHAR — 1074/2024

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM040013682024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1074/2024

Filing Date

05-10-2024

Registration No

1074/2024

Registration Date

05-10-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202026240065

Police Station

JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BHARATBHAI KARABHAI MANDERA Advocate - M L PATHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

01-04-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

02-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

31-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

01-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the accused, Bharatbhai Karabhai Mandera, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment notes critical evidentual weaknesses: the panchnama (seizure document) lacked independent corroboration from neutral witnesses, no FSL report verified the recovered material was illicit liquor, and the investigation contained procedural irregularities including lack of independent witness statements and unclear chain of custody documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused, Bharatbhai Karabhai Mandera, of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment notes critical evidentual weaknesses: the panchnama (seizure document) lacked independent corroboration from neutral witnesses, no FSL report verified the recovered material was illicit liquor, and the investigation contained procedural irregularities including lack of independent witness statements and unclear chain of custody documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case