Government of Gujarat vs VINUBHAI MANDABHAI MORI Advocate - N H LALANI — 1019/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65BCDEF. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040012992025
Filing Number
1019/2025
Filing Date
13-08-2025
Registration No
1019/2025
Registration Date
13-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202026250290
Police Station
JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VINUBHAI MANDABHAI MORI Advocate - N H LALANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 05-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1019/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Vinubhai Mandabhai Mori, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(B)(C)(D)(E)(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although police witnesses testified about seizing illicit liquor and equipment during a raid, the court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchas (independent witnesses) did not corroborate the material facts of the case, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to confirm the seized materials were actually prohibited liquor, and there was no independent witness testimony supporting that the accused had direct possession of contraband. The court emphasized that police testimony alone, without independent corroboration and scientific verification, was insufficient to establish guilt, particularly regarding the nature and ownership of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1019/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Vinubhai Mandabhai Mori, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(B)(C)(D)(E)(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although police witnesses testified about seizing illicit liquor and equipment during a raid, the court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchas (independent witnesses) did not corroborate the material facts of the case, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to confirm the seized materials were actually prohibited liquor, and there was no independent witness testimony supporting that the accused had direct possession of contraband. The court emphasized that police testimony alone, without independent corroboration and scientific verification, was insufficient to establish guilt, particularly regarding the nature and ownership of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts