Government of Gujarat vs VINUBHAI MANDABHAI MORI Advocate - N H LALANI — 1019/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65BCDEF. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM040012992025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1019/2025

Filing Date

13-08-2025

Registration No

1019/2025

Registration Date

13-08-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202026250290

Police Station

JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65BCDEF

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VINUBHAI MANDABHAI MORI Advocate - N H LALANI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

01-04-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

16-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

05-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1019/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Vinubhai Mandabhai Mori, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(B)(C)(D)(E)(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although police witnesses testified about seizing illicit liquor and equipment during a raid, the court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchas (independent witnesses) did not corroborate the material facts of the case, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to confirm the seized materials were actually prohibited liquor, and there was no independent witness testimony supporting that the accused had direct possession of contraband. The court emphasized that police testimony alone, without independent corroboration and scientific verification, was insufficient to establish guilt, particularly regarding the nature and ownership of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1019/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Vinubhai Mandabhai Mori, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(B)(C)(D)(E)(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although police witnesses testified about seizing illicit liquor and equipment during a raid, the court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchas (independent witnesses) did not corroborate the material facts of the case, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to confirm the seized materials were actually prohibited liquor, and there was no independent witness testimony supporting that the accused had direct possession of contraband. The court emphasized that police testimony alone, without independent corroboration and scientific verification, was insufficient to establish guilt, particularly regarding the nature and ownership of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case