Government of Gujarat vs KULDEEPSINH JETHUBHA JADEJA Advocate - N H LALANI — 928/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040012052025
Filing Number
928/2025
Filing Date
07-08-2025
Registration No
928/2025
Registration Date
07-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202013250126
Police Station
SETHVADALA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KULDEEPSINH JETHUBHA JADEJA Advocate - N H LALANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 05-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 928/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Kuldeepsinh Jethubha Jadeja, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that prohibited liquor recovered during a police raid on April 28, 2025, was in the accused's possession. Key Reasoning: While police witnesses testified to the recovery of eight bottles of country liquor valued at ₹800 during a raid near Vanana village, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The independent witness (panch) testimony—crucial in Indian criminal procedure—did not corroborate the seizure details. The court noted the absence of FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report to confirm the liquid was illegal liquor, lack of independent witness statements in investigation records, and insufficient documentary evidence supporting the prosecution's case. The court emphasized that police evidence alone, without independent corroboration, could not sustain conviction in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 928/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Kuldeepsinh Jethubha Jadeja, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that prohibited liquor recovered during a police raid on April 28, 2025, was in the accused's possession. Key Reasoning: While police witnesses testified to the recovery of eight bottles of country liquor valued at ₹800 during a raid near Vanana village, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The independent witness (panch) testimony—crucial in Indian criminal procedure—did not corroborate the seizure details. The court noted the absence of FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report to confirm the liquid was illegal liquor, lack of independent witness statements in investigation records, and insufficient documentary evidence supporting the prosecution's case. The court emphasized that police evidence alone, without independent corroboration, could not sustain conviction in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts