NAYAB ENGINEER SAHEB PGVCL-VERAD SUB DIVISION-VERAD vs BHARATBHAI RAYDEBHAI SHIR — 47/2024

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 21st April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJM040010192024

Case disposed

Filing Number

47/2024

Filing Date

11-06-2024

Registration No

47/2024

Registration Date

11-06-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX

Acts & Sections

ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 Section 54

Petitioner(s)

NAYAB ENGINEER SAHEB PGVCL-VERAD SUB DIVISION-VERAD

Adv. M T NANAVATI

Respondent(s)

BHARATBHAI RAYDEBHAI SHIR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

21-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

16-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

02-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

30-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

21-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 47/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Bharatbhai Raydebhai Shir for illegal electricity theft. The court found that the defendant unlawfully tapped into the plaintiff's low-tension power line and consumed 1437 watts of electricity without authorization, and ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 27,135.88 (electricity bill amount) within 60 days. The court further directed that if payment is not made, the amount shall be recovered from the defendant's property, and simple interest at 6% per annum shall accrue on the outstanding amount from the judgment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 47/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Bharatbhai Raydebhai Shir for illegal electricity theft. The court found that the defendant unlawfully tapped into the plaintiff's low-tension power line and consumed 1437 watts of electricity without authorization, and ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 27,135.88 (electricity bill amount) within 60 days. The court further directed that if payment is not made, the amount shall be recovered from the defendant's property, and simple interest at 6% per annum shall accrue on the outstanding amount from the judgment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case