Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI JAMNADASBHAI PADALIYA Advocate - N H LALANI — 742/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040009782025
Filing Number
742/2025
Filing Date
04-07-2025
Registration No
742/2025
Registration Date
04-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202026230979
Police Station
JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VIJAYBHAI JAMNADASBHAI PADALIYA Advocate - N H LALANI
KAMLESBHAI RAMESBHAI VAVECHA
Adv. V R TRAMBADIYA
MAHIPALSINH JETHUBHA JADEJA
Adv. V R TRAMBADIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 29-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 742/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused persons under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While police witnesses testified about seizing English whisky bottles from accused #1's possession on December 28, 2023, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The independent witnesses (panchas) who conducted the seizure panchnama did not substantively corroborate the seizure details during their testimony—they merely confirmed signing the document. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the seized items were prohibited alcohol. The court determined that without supporting evidence from independent sources, the prosecution could not conclusively prove the accused's illegal possession of prohibited liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 742/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused persons under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While police witnesses testified about seizing English whisky bottles from accused #1's possession on December 28, 2023, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The independent witnesses (panchas) who conducted the seizure panchnama did not substantively corroborate the seizure details during their testimony—they merely confirmed signing the document. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the seized items were prohibited alcohol. The court determined that without supporting evidence from independent sources, the prosecution could not conclusively prove the accused's illegal possession of prohibited liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts