Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI JAMNADASBHAI PADALIYA Advocate - N H LALANI — 742/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM040009782025

Filing Number

742/2025

Filing Date

04-Jul-2025

Registration No

742/2025

Registration Date

04-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202026230979

Police Station

JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYBHAI JAMNADASBHAI PADALIYA Advocate - N H LALANI

  2. 2.KAMLESBHAI RAMESBHAI VAVECHA

    Adv. V R TRAMBADIYA

  3. 3.MAHIPALSINH JETHUBHA JADEJA

    Adv. V R TRAMBADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 742/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused persons under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While police witnesses testified about seizing English whisky bottles from accused #1's possession on December 28, 2023, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The independent witnesses (panchas) who conducted the seizure panchnama did not substantively corroborate the seizure details during their testimony—they merely confirmed signing the document. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the seized items were prohibited alcohol. The court determined that without supporting evidence from independent sources, the prosecution could not conclusively prove the accused's illegal possession of prohibited liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 06-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 04-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 742/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 742/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused persons under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While police witnesses testified about seizing English whisky bottles from accused #1's possession on December 28, 2023, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The independent witnesses (panchas) who conducted the seizure panchnama did not substantively corroborate the seizure details during their testimony—they merely confirmed signing the document. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the seized items were prohibited alcohol. The court determined that without supporting evidence from independent sources, the prosecution could not conclusively prove the accused's illegal possession of prohibited liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case