Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI JAMNADASBHAI PADALIYA Advocate - N H LALANI — 742/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM040009782025

Case disposedSub Stage

Filing Number

742/2025

Filing Date

04-07-2025

Registration No

742/2025

Registration Date

04-07-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202026230979

Police Station

JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,116B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VIJAYBHAI JAMNADASBHAI PADALIYA Advocate - N H LALANI

KAMLESBHAI RAMESBHAI VAVECHA

Adv. V R TRAMBADIYA

MAHIPALSINH JETHUBHA JADEJA

Adv. V R TRAMBADIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

16-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

02-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

29-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 742/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused persons under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While police witnesses testified about seizing English whisky bottles from accused #1's possession on December 28, 2023, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The independent witnesses (panchas) who conducted the seizure panchnama did not substantively corroborate the seizure details during their testimony—they merely confirmed signing the document. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the seized items were prohibited alcohol. The court determined that without supporting evidence from independent sources, the prosecution could not conclusively prove the accused's illegal possession of prohibited liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 742/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused persons under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While police witnesses testified about seizing English whisky bottles from accused #1's possession on December 28, 2023, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. The independent witnesses (panchas) who conducted the seizure panchnama did not substantively corroborate the seizure details during their testimony—they merely confirmed signing the document. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the seized items were prohibited alcohol. The court determined that without supporting evidence from independent sources, the prosecution could not conclusively prove the accused's illegal possession of prohibited liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case