Government of Gujarat vs DILIPBHAI DHARAMSIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - N H LALANI — 740/2025

JudegementView PDF

The court acquitted defendant Dilipbhai Dharamsibhai Parmar of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while police witnesses testified to recovering illicit liquor from the accused's premises, independent corroborating evidence—particularly from the panchas (neutral witnesses) who were supposedly present during the raid—was insufficient to establish guilt with certainty. The court emphasized that without credible independent verification and proper documentary evidence (including FSL reports), the allegations remained unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Final Arguments

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 740/2025