Government of Gujarat vs TEJASHBHAI SURESHBHAI NATHAVANI(Absconding) Advocate - C S GOSWAMI — 625/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 507,506(2),189. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040007782019
Filing Number
625/2019
Filing Date
05-Aug-2019
Registration No
625/2019
Registration Date
05-Aug-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
08
Police Station
JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.TEJASHBHAI SURESHBHAI NATHAVANI(Absconding) Advocate - C S GOSWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 625/2019 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Tejashbhai Sureshbhai Nathavani of charges under IPC Sections 507, 506(2), and 189, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that while the complainant witnesses testified to receiving threatening calls regarding denying leave to a female conductor, the evidence did not establish that the accused made these calls. Critical gaps included: no proof the accused possessed the mobile number from which calls originated, no CDR (call detail records) linking the accused to the calls, and inconsistent witness testimonies regarding whether they actually heard the accused's voice. Applying the principle that suspicion cannot replace proof and that reasonable doubt must benefit the accused, the court granted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Nov-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Sep-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jun-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-May-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Oct-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jul-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jul-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jun-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-May-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Apr-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Feb-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jan-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Nov-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Sep-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Aug-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jul-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jun-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-May-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2020
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2020
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2019
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 625/2019
Summary of Case 625/2019 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Tejashbhai Sureshbhai Nathavani of charges under IPC Sections 507, 506(2), and 189, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that while the complainant witnesses testified to receiving threatening calls regarding denying leave to a female conductor, the evidence did not establish that the accused made these calls. Critical gaps included: no proof the accused possessed the mobile number from which calls originated, no CDR (call detail records) linking the accused to the calls, and inconsistent witness testimonies regarding whether they actually heard the accused's voice. Applying the principle that suspicion cannot replace proof and that reasonable doubt must benefit the accused, the court granted acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts