PGVCL - Samana vs SUVAIBHAI ISHMAYALBHAI KHURESHI — 21/2024
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--EX on 21st April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJM040006922024
Filing Number
21/2024
Filing Date
25-04-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
25-04-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL - Samana
Adv. A K VYAS
Respondent(s)
SUVAIBHAI ISHMAYALBHAI KHURESHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Suvaibhai Ishmayalbhai Khureshi (21/2024) The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Suvaibhai for unauthorized electricity theft and pending dues. The court found that the respondent illegally drew power without a valid connection, stealing electricity worth Rs. 11,187-48 plus delayed charges of Rs. 3,324-06 (total Rs. 14,511-54). The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount within 60 days with 6% annual interest thereafter, and directed recovery from respondent's property if needed. However, the court rejected the petitioner's claim for 15% interest on delayed charges, awarding only 6% statutory interest instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Suvaibhai Ishmayalbhai Khureshi (21/2024) The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against respondent Suvaibhai for unauthorized electricity theft and pending dues. The court found that the respondent illegally drew power without a valid connection, stealing electricity worth Rs. 11,187-48 plus delayed charges of Rs. 3,324-06 (total Rs. 14,511-54). The court ordered the respondent to pay this amount within 60 days with 6% annual interest thereafter, and directed recovery from respondent's property if needed. However, the court rejected the petitioner's claim for 15% interest on delayed charges, awarding only 6% statutory interest instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts