SAROJBEN WIFE OF HARESHBHAI KARENA DOUGHTER OF PUNJABHAI PIPROTAR vs RASHIKBHAI JIVABHAI SAGAR Advocate - D J JADEJA — 3/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 22-Jul-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJM040004512025

Filing Number

3/2025

Filing Date

07-Feb-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

07-Feb-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9
Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAROJBEN WIFE OF HARESHBHAI KARENA DOUGHTER OF PUNJABHAI PIPROTAR

    Adv. M T NANAVATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RASHIKBHAI JIVABHAI SAGAR Advocate - D J JADEJA

  2. 2.JAMANBHAI JIVABHAI SAGAR

    Adv. D J JADEJA

  3. 3.HARESHBHAI JIVABHAI SAGAR

    Adv. A K BAGADA

  4. 4.NATHIBEN JIVABHAI SAGAR

    Adv. D J JADEJA

  5. 5.SAGAR KANTABEN JIVABHAI WIFE OF RAJESHBHAI CHIMANBHAI GORFAD

    Adv. D J JADEJA

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 3/2025 Outcome: Petitioner's interim application (Rule 5 petition under CPC Order 8) DISMISSED/REJECTED. The petitioner sought status quo orders on agricultural and residential properties pending final judgment in a family property dispute. The court declined to grant interim injunctions, noting that an earlier interim order regarding agricultural land in Vasantpur was already in place. The court found that granting additional interim relief at this stage was not warranted, as the factual and legal disputes required fuller examination under proper procedural rules rather than summary admission-based judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 26-May-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-May-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 05-May-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 30-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 24-Mar-2026

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 20-Mar-2026

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 10-Mar-2026

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 03-Feb-2026

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 06-Jan-2026

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 05-Dec-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 07-Nov-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 15-Oct-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 10-Sep-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 12-Aug-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 15-Jul-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 13-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 09-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 09-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 30-Apr-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 01-Apr-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 07-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 07-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 3/2025 Outcome: Petitioner's interim application (Rule 5 petition under CPC Order 8) DISMISSED/REJECTED. The petitioner sought status quo orders on agricultural and residential properties pending final judgment in a family property dispute. The court declined to grant interim injunctions, noting that an earlier interim order regarding agricultural land in Vasantpur was already in place. The court found that granting additional interim relief at this stage was not warranted, as the factual and legal disputes required fuller examination under proper procedural rules rather than summary admission-based judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case