Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHAI KARAMASHIBHAI DADHANIYA Advocate - A P LALKIYA — 5/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),117(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040000132025
Filing Number
5/2025
Filing Date
04-01-2025
Registration No
5/2025
Registration Date
04-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202013240253
Police Station
SETHVADALA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SURESHBHAI KARAMASHIBHAI DADHANIYA Advocate - A P LALKIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 08-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai Karamashibhai Dadhaniya Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamjodhpur acquitted defendant Sureshbhai Karamashibhai Dadhaniya of charges under IPC sections 115(2), 117(2), 352, and 351(3). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the complainant or made threatening statements. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony, the court found that prosecution witnesses admitted during cross-examination that the accused and complainant had merely normal conversation that escalated into a quarrel, after which the complainant lost balance and fell. No credible evidence proved the accused struck blows, caused injuries, or issued threats as alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sureshbhai Karamashibhai Dadhaniya Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jamjodhpur acquitted defendant Sureshbhai Karamashibhai Dadhaniya of charges under IPC sections 115(2), 117(2), 352, and 351(3). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted the complainant or made threatening statements. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony, the court found that prosecution witnesses admitted during cross-examination that the accused and complainant had merely normal conversation that escalated into a quarrel, after which the complainant lost balance and fell. No credible evidence proved the accused struck blows, caused injuries, or issued threats as alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts