ARJAN PALABHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL — 169/2008
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th April 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJJM030028782017
Filing Number
169/2008
Filing Date
18-11-2017
Registration No
169/2008
Registration Date
23-07-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, LALPUR
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARJAN PALABHAI
Adv. J.A.VYAS
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 03-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 169 of 2008 The Primary Sr. Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Arjan Palabhai's land acquisition reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC for default. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration with directions for parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear in court on scheduled dates (09.02.2026, 03.03.2026, 16.03.2026, and 13.04.2026) without filing adjournment applications, thereby breaching their undertaking before the High Court. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the reference due to the petitioner's non-compliance and failure to submit evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 169 of 2008 The Primary Sr. Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Arjan Palabhai's land acquisition reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC for default. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration with directions for parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear in court on scheduled dates (09.02.2026, 03.03.2026, 16.03.2026, and 13.04.2026) without filing adjournment applications, thereby breaching their undertaking before the High Court. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the reference due to the petitioner's non-compliance and failure to submit evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts