DILTAJ UMARBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - K.H.BHATT — 166/2008
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th April 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJJM030028722017
Filing Number
166/2008
Filing Date
18-11-2017
Registration No
166/2008
Registration Date
23-07-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, LALPUR
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DILTAJ UMARBHAI
Adv. J.A.VYAS
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - K.H.BHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 03-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Primary Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Diltaj Umarbhai's Land Acquisition Reference (L.A.R. 166/2008) for default under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC on April 13, 2026. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates (March 3 and 16, 2026) despite undertaking speedy disposal, submitted no evidence, and remained absent even on the final hearing date without requesting adjournment. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Primary Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Diltaj Umarbhai's Land Acquisition Reference (L.A.R. 166/2008) for default under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC on April 13, 2026. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates (March 3 and 16, 2026) despite undertaking speedy disposal, submitted no evidence, and remained absent even on the final hearing date without requesting adjournment. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts