DOSTMAMAD KASAMBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - K.H.BHATT — 165/2008

Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th April 2026.

LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE

CNR: GJJM030028702017

Case disposed

Filing Number

165/2008

Filing Date

18-11-2017

Registration No

165/2008

Registration Date

23-07-2008

Court

TALUKA COURT, LALPUR

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 Section 018

Petitioner(s)

DOSTMAMAD KASAMBHAI

Adv. J.A.VYAS

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - K.H.BHATT

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

13-04-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

03-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

17-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

09-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

13-04-2026
ORDER

Summary: The Primary Senior Civil Court at Lalpur dismissed Dostmamad Kasambhai's Land Acquisition Reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC for default. The case was remanded by the Gujarat High Court with directions for both parties to submit evidence within four weeks and for the court to decide within six months. However, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates (03.03.2026, 16.03.2026, and the final hearing on 13.04.2026) without submitting any evidence or adjournment request, breaching their undertaking to the High Court, leaving the court no alternative but to dismiss the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-12-2018
JUDEGEMENT
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Primary Senior Civil Court at Lalpur dismissed Dostmamad Kasambhai's Land Acquisition Reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC for default. The case was remanded by the Gujarat High Court with directions for both parties to submit evidence within four weeks and for the court to decide within six months. However, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates (03.03.2026, 16.03.2026, and the final hearing on 13.04.2026) without submitting any evidence or adjournment request, breaching their undertaking to the High Court, leaving the court no alternative but to dismiss the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, LALPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case