KARMAN KHIMA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - K.H.BHATT — 163/2008
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th April 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJJM030028662017
Filing Number
163/2008
Filing Date
18-11-2017
Registration No
163/2008
Registration Date
23-07-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, LALPUR
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KARMAN KHIMA
Adv. J.A.VYAS
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - K.H.BHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 03-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 163/2008 (Karman Khima v. State of Gujarat) The Primary Senior Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Karman Khima's Land Acquisition Reference challenging an award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1984. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for fresh hearing with directions for parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates (03.03.2026, 16.03.2026, and the final hearing on 13.04.2026) without adjournment applications or evidence submission. The court dismissed the application for default under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC, holding the petitioner failed to comply with the High Court's undertaking for speedy disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 163/2008 (Karman Khima v. State of Gujarat) The Primary Senior Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Karman Khima's Land Acquisition Reference challenging an award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1984. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for fresh hearing with directions for parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates (03.03.2026, 16.03.2026, and the final hearing on 13.04.2026) without adjournment applications or evidence submission. The court dismissed the application for default under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC, holding the petitioner failed to comply with the High Court's undertaking for speedy disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts