AJITBHAI UMARBHAI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - K.H.BHATT — 161/2008
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th April 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJJM030028622017
Filing Number
161/2008
Filing Date
18-11-2017
Registration No
161/2008
Registration Date
23-07-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, LALPUR
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AJITBHAI UMARBHAI
Adv. J.A.VYAS
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - K.H.BHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 03-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 161 of 2008 The Primary Sr. Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Ajitbhai Umarbhai's Land Acquisition Reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC for default. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for fresh hearing with a direction for parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear on scheduled dates (09.02.2026, 03.03.2026, and 16.03.2026) and submitted no evidence despite undertaking to cooperate for speedy disposal. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the application due to the applicant's non-compliance and default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 161 of 2008 The Primary Sr. Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Ajitbhai Umarbhai's Land Acquisition Reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC for default. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for fresh hearing with a direction for parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear on scheduled dates (09.02.2026, 03.03.2026, and 16.03.2026) and submitted no evidence despite undertaking to cooperate for speedy disposal. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the application due to the applicant's non-compliance and default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts