BHIMSI JAGA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL — 157/2008
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th April 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJJM030028542017
Filing Number
157/2008
Filing Date
18-11-2017
Registration No
157/2008
Registration Date
23-07-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, LALPUR
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHIMSI JAGA
Adv. J.A.VYAS
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 03-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 157 of 2008 The Primary Sr. Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Bhimsi Jaga's Land Acquisition Reference against the State of Gujarat for default under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration and directed both parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates (03.03.2026, 16.03.2026, and 13.04.2026) without any adjournment application or evidence submission, thereby breaching the undertaking given before the High Court. Consequently, the court dismissed the reference and ordered each party to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: L.A.R. No. 157 of 2008 The Primary Sr. Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed Bhimsi Jaga's Land Acquisition Reference against the State of Gujarat for default under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration and directed both parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates (03.03.2026, 16.03.2026, and 13.04.2026) without any adjournment application or evidence submission, thereby breaching the undertaking given before the High Court. Consequently, the court dismissed the reference and ordered each party to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts