VIKRAM DHANA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL — 153/2008
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th April 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJJM030028462017
Filing Number
153/2008
Filing Date
18-11-2017
Registration No
153/2008
Registration Date
23-07-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, LALPUR
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIKRAM DHANA
Adv. J.A.VYAS
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 03-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Vikram Dhana v. The State of Gujarat (L.A.R. No. 153/2008) The Primary Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed petitioner Vikram Dhana's Land Acquisition Reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC for default. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates (09.02.2026, 03.03.2026, 16.03.2026) without submitting evidence or adjournment applications, breaching his undertaking before the High Court. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the reference and ordered parties to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Vikram Dhana v. The State of Gujarat (L.A.R. No. 153/2008) The Primary Civil Court, Lalpur dismissed petitioner Vikram Dhana's Land Acquisition Reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC for default. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates (09.02.2026, 03.03.2026, 16.03.2026) without submitting evidence or adjournment applications, breaching his undertaking before the High Court. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the reference and ordered parties to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts