PUNJA VEJA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL — 151/2008
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th April 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJJM030028422017
Filing Number
151/2008
Filing Date
18-11-2017
Registration No
151/2008
Registration Date
23-07-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, LALPUR
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUNJA VEJA
Adv. J.A.VYAS
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 03-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: L.A.R. No. 151/2008 – Punja Veja v. State of Gujarat The court dismissed petitioner Punja Veja's Land Acquisition Reference for default under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for fresh hearing with a directive for both parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple court dates (03.03.2026 and 16.03.2026) and did not submit any supporting evidence, breaching their undertaking to the High Court. The court found no alternative but dismissal given the petitioner's non-compliance and absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: L.A.R. No. 151/2008 – Punja Veja v. State of Gujarat The court dismissed petitioner Punja Veja's Land Acquisition Reference for default under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for fresh hearing with a directive for both parties to submit evidence within four weeks, the petitioner failed to appear on multiple court dates (03.03.2026 and 16.03.2026) and did not submit any supporting evidence, breaching their undertaking to the High Court. The court found no alternative but dismissal given the petitioner's non-compliance and absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts