JETHA PANCHA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL — 146/2008
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 018. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th April 2026.
LAR - LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE CASE
CNR: GJJM030028322017
Filing Number
146/2008
Filing Date
18-11-2017
Registration No
146/2008
Registration Date
23-07-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, LALPUR
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JETHA PANCHA
Adv. J A VYAS
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - R.V.RAVEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 03-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 146/2008 (Jetha Pancha v. State of Gujarat) The court dismissed Jetha Pancha's Land Acquisition Reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC for default. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration with directions for parties to submit evidence within four weeks and the court to decide within six months, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear on scheduled dates (09.02.2026, 03.03.2026, and 16.03.2026) without seeking adjournment or submitting evidence, thereby breaching their undertaking before the High Court. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 146/2008 (Jetha Pancha v. State of Gujarat) The court dismissed Jetha Pancha's Land Acquisition Reference under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC for default. After the Gujarat High Court remanded the case for reconsideration with directions for parties to submit evidence within four weeks and the court to decide within six months, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear on scheduled dates (09.02.2026, 03.03.2026, and 16.03.2026) without seeking adjournment or submitting evidence, thereby breaching their undertaking before the High Court. The court found no alternative but to dismiss the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts