hothibhai nurmamadbhai notiyar vs umar nurmamad notiyar Advocate - R N JADEJA — 4/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 39. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJM030002292024
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
4/2024
Filing Date
02-02-2024
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
02-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, LALPUR
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
hothibhai nurmamadbhai notiyar
Adv. N R DHRUVA
Respondent(s)
umar nurmamad notiyar Advocate - R N JADEJA
husen umar notiyar
Adv. R N JADEJA
asif umar notiyar
Adv. R N JADEJA
hanif umar notiyar
Adv. R N JADEJA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 05-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 27-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 20-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary In Regular Civil Suit No. 04/2024, plaintiff Hothibhai Nurmamadbhai Notiyar sought a temporary injunction under Order 39, Rules 1-2 of the CPC against defendants Umar Nurmamad Notiyar, Husen Umar Notiyar, and Asif Umar Notiyar regarding disputed ancestral property in Vavdi Village, Jamnagar. The court rejected the injunction application, finding no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss that couldn't be compensated monetarily. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Regular Civil Suit No. 04/2024, plaintiff Hothibhai Nurmamadbhai Notiyar sought a temporary injunction under Order 39, Rules 1-2 of the CPC against defendants Umar Nurmamad Notiyar, Husen Umar Notiyar, and Asif Umar Notiyar regarding disputed ancestral property in Vavdi Village, Jamnagar. The court rejected the injunction application, finding no prima facie case, no balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss that couldn't be compensated monetarily. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts