P.GV.C.L. THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER vs DAXABEN MANISHBHAI LAKHIYAR — 232/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 36. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJJM020182252025
Filing Number
232/2025
Filing Date
27-Nov-2025
Registration No
232/2025
Registration Date
27-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.GV.C.L. THROUGH DEPUTY ENGINEER
Adv. D J NADIADHARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAXABEN MANISHBHAI LAKHIYAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 232/2025: The court dismissed the execution petition filed by P.G.V.C.L. (petitioner) against Daxaben Manishbhai Lakhiyar (respondent) due to the petitioner's failure to comply with procedural requirements and non-appearance before the court. The court found that the petitioner did not take necessary legal action as mandated and the respondent failed to appear despite service of notice, rendering further prosecution of the case unjustifiable. Additionally, the court directed the petitioner to bear the costs of the execution proceedings in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Dec-2025
Process Of Execution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 232/2025
Summary of Case 232/2025: The court dismissed the execution petition filed by P.G.V.C.L. (petitioner) against Daxaben Manishbhai Lakhiyar (respondent) due to the petitioner's failure to comply with procedural requirements and non-appearance before the court. The court found that the petitioner did not take necessary legal action as mandated and the respondent failed to appear despite service of notice, rendering further prosecution of the case unjustifiable. Additionally, the court directed the petitioner to bear the costs of the execution proceedings in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts