ROLEX METALS COMPONETS PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM THROUGH ITS PROP CHIRAG MAKANBHAI MUNGARA vs SOIGNER TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - B S DUTTA — 44/2024

Case under The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 6,12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

COMM CS - COMMERCIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJM020173732024

Filing Number

44/2024

Filing Date

27-Nov-2024

Registration No

44/2024

Registration Date

27-Nov-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 6,12
Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROLEX METALS COMPONETS PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM THROUGH ITS PROP CHIRAG MAKANBHAI MUNGARA

    Adv. P M ABHANGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOIGNER TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - B S DUTTA

  2. 2.PIYUSH LAXMANBHAI YADAV DIRECTOR OF SOIGNER TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED

  3. 3.LAXMANBHAI RAMBHAI YADAV DIRECTOR OF SOIGNER TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: COMM CS/44/2024 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Judge of Jamnagar allowed the plaintiff's claim and ordered the defendants (Soigner Technology Private Limited and its directors) to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 4,08,848/- (plus 6% annual interest from the date the case was filed until payment) for brass products supplied by the plaintiff. The court rejected the defendants' defense that no formal purchase order was issued, finding that goods were delivered on the defendants' oral request via quotation and were received by them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 01-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 06-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 19-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 17-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 22-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 26-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 11-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 23-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 07-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 11-Dec-2024

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 27-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 27-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COMM CS/44/2024 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Judge of Jamnagar allowed the plaintiff's claim and ordered the defendants (Soigner Technology Private Limited and its directors) to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 4,08,848/- (plus 6% annual interest from the date the case was filed until payment) for brass products supplied by the plaintiff. The court rejected the defendants' defense that no formal purchase order was issued, finding that goods were delivered on the defendants' oral request via quotation and were received by them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case