SAURASHTRA GRAMIN BANK THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER SHREE VASANTRAI JAMNADAS PARMANI vs SANJAYSINH RAMSANG KER Advocate - D C RATHOD — 121/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

COMM CS - COMMERCIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJM020172932023

Filing Number

121/2023

Filing Date

12-Dec-2023

Registration No

121/2023

Registration Date

12-Dec-2023

Court

CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAURASHTRA GRAMIN BANK THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER SHREE VASANTRAI JAMNADAS PARMANI

    Adv. K R KANJARIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAYSINH RAMSANG KER Advocate - D C RATHOD

  2. 2.BHANUBEN RAMSANG KER

  3. 3.MEENUBEN RAMSANG KER

  4. 4.KISHORSINH RAMSANG KER

  5. 5.JAYABA RAMSANG KER

  6. 6.PARUBA BHIKUBHA KER

  7. 7.MANJULABA ANOPSINH KER

  8. 8.MINOR BHUMIKABA ANOPSINH KER M.O. MANJULABA ANOPSINH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Saurashtra Gramin Bank v. Sanjaysinh Ramsang Ker Case No. 121/2023 | Decided: 07-05-2026 Saurashtra Gramin Bank sued defendants to recover Rs. 9,20,426.80, claiming unpaid agricultural loan installments. The bank argued defendants borrowed Rs. 6,42,000 on 19-06-2020 but failed to repay despite notices. Defendants contested, arguing the bank miscalculated interest (charging interest on penalty interest) and claimed poverty prevented repayment. Court's Decision: The court partially allowed the bank's claim. It held defendants validly received the loan but didn't repay fully. The court ordered defendants to pay interest at 7% per annum on the first Rs. 3,00,000 and 13% per annum on the remaining amount—rejecting the bank's claimed total of Rs. 9,20,426.80 as unproven. Defendants must pay calculated amount within 30 days, failing which 13% interest accrues further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 03-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 12-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 29-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 15-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 29-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 15-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 01-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 17-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 03-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 18-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 04-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 30-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 27-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 25-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 18-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 17-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 03-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 03-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 03-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 28-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 15-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 11-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 06-May-2024

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 09-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 01-Apr-2024

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 05-Mar-2024

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 23-Feb-2024

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  39. 30-Jan-2024

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  40. 12-Jan-2024

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  41. 12-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 12-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Saurashtra Gramin Bank v. Sanjaysinh Ramsang Ker Case No. 121/2023 | Decided: 07-05-2026 Saurashtra Gramin Bank sued defendants to recover Rs. 9,20,426.80, claiming unpaid agricultural loan installments. The bank argued defendants borrowed Rs. 6,42,000 on 19-06-2020 but failed to repay despite notices. Defendants contested, arguing the bank miscalculated interest (charging interest on penalty interest) and claimed poverty prevented repayment. Court's Decision: The court partially allowed the bank's claim. It held defendants validly received the loan but didn't repay fully. The court ordered defendants to pay interest at 7% per annum on the first Rs. 3,00,000 and 13% per annum on the remaining amount—rejecting the bank's claimed total of Rs. 9,20,426.80 as unproven. Defendants must pay calculated amount within 30 days, failing which 13% interest accrues further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case