Government of Gujarat vs SAGARBHAI MANSUKHBHAI DHAMI Advocate - R D GOSAI — 11330/2024
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 85,115(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM020164092024
Filing Number
11330/2024
Filing Date
13-Nov-2024
Registration No
11330/2024
Registration Date
13-Nov-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202001240056
Police Station
MAHILA POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. J D KARSARIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAGARBHAI MANSUKHBHAI DHAMI Advocate - R D GOSAI
-
2.CHANDRIKABEN WIFE OF MANSUKHBHAI MOHANBHAI DHAMI
-
3.DHAVAL MANSUKHBHAI MOHANBHAI DHAMI
-
4.MONIKABEN WIFE OF DHAVAL MANSUKHBHAI DHAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 11330/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons (husband, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and sister-in-law) of charges under IPC Sections 85, 115(2), and 54, finding the prosecution failed to prove the dowry harassment case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant testified about minor domestic quarrels and discord within the matrimonial home, she did not establish any credible evidence of physical or mental torture by the accused. The court applied the principle that when two interpretations of evidence exist, the one favoring the accused must be adopted, particularly noting the complainant's own testimony contradicted the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 11330/2024
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 11330/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons (husband, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and sister-in-law) of charges under IPC Sections 85, 115(2), and 54, finding the prosecution failed to prove the dowry harassment case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant testified about minor domestic quarrels and discord within the matrimonial home, she did not establish any credible evidence of physical or mental torture by the accused. The court applied the principle that when two interpretations of evidence exist, the one favoring the accused must be adopted, particularly noting the complainant's own testimony contradicted the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts